Stacking Support: Yes, stackable via stacking ports
Max Power Consumption: 400W
Dimensions: 17.3 x 8.9 x 1.7 inches
Management: UniFi Controller / Web UI
Curation Review
✔ Pros:240W PoE budget for high device density; Dual 10G SFP+ uplink ports for high-bandwidth core connectivity; Layer 3 routing capabilities for VLAN and inter-subnet management; Centralized UniFi controller integration with intuitive dashboard; Stackable design for scalable network growth; Fanless or near-silent operation; Enterprise-grade build quality in compact form factor
✘ Cons:Requires UniFi Controller for advanced management features (standalone mode is limited); Higher initial cost compared to unmanaged switches; Limited to 10G uplinks rather than 40G or higher bandwidth options; Learning curve for users unfamiliar with UniFi ecosystem; No console port for legacy terminal-based management; PoE budget may be insufficient for very high-density deployments with power-hungry APs
Est. Price:
$899 - $1,399
Compare Against
Juniper Networks QFX5230-64CD
★ 3.3 Value Score
Technical Specifications
Switching Capacity: 25.6 Tbps
Forwarding Rate: 600 Mpps
Ports: 64x QSFP28 (100G) + 2x 10GbE management
PoE Budget: N/A - Data center switch
Layer: L3 (IP routing)
Stacking Support: Yes - up to 10 units
Fabric Architecture: Modular
Power Consumption: ~3200W typical
Form Factor: 1U RackMount
Buffer Memory: 256 MB per port
Curation Review
✔ Pros:Industry-leading 25.6 Tbps switching capacity; Supports 100G QSFP28 interfaces for high-density deployments; Excellent for data center spine/leaf architectures with low latency; Modular design allows chassis stacking for fault tolerance; Full L3 routing with comprehensive BGP/OSPF support; Power-efficient for large-scale deployments
✘ Cons:High initial capital cost limits adoption in smaller deployments; Requires skilled networking engineers for optimal configuration; Complex licensing model for advanced features; Limited PoE capability makes it unsuitable for access-layer deployments; Proprietary Junos OS requires vendor lock-in; Optical transceiver costs can be substantial for 100G deployment