Antenna Configuration: Internal dual-band antenna with 4x4 MIMO
Form Factor: Wall/Ceiling mount
Security: 802.1X, WPA3, AES encryption
Band Steering: Yes
Airtime Fairness: Yes
Curation Review
✔ Pros:Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) delivers 4x higher throughput and 4x lower latency than Wi-Fi 5; Excellent for high-density deployments (600+ clients); Energy-efficient with lower power consumption than previous generations; Supports fast roaming (802.11k/v/w) for seamless mobility; Compact form factor suitable for modern office aesthetics; Strong security with WPA3 support; Dual-band reduces interference with simultaneous 2.4GHz and 5GHz operation
✘ Cons:Requires PoE+ infrastructure which adds deployment cost; 1 Gigabit uplink can become bottleneck in high-throughput scenarios; Premium pricing compared to Wi-Fi 5 alternatives; Single uplink port limits failover options without additional equipment; Requires compatible Catalyst wireless controller or cloud-managed dashboard; May be overkill for basic office needs with lower client density
Est. Price:
$1,250 - $1,650
Compare Against
Cisco Catalyst 9176I (CW9176I)
★ 4.3 Value Score
Technical Specifications
Switching Capacity: 51.2 Tbps
Forwarding Rate: 38.4 Tbps
Chassis Slots: 16-slot modular
Port Options: Varies by line card configuration (up to 576 10GE/25GE ports or mixed)
Layer Support: L2/L3
PoE Support: Supported via optional PoE line cards
✔ Pros:Modular architecture allows flexible configuration for enterprise campuses; Extremely high switching capacity (51.2 Tbps) supports massive scale deployments; Full redundancy with dual supervisors and hot-swappable components; Integrated security and SD-Access ready; Supports latest 25GE/40GE/100GE line cards for future-proof design
✘ Cons:Very high capital expense ($85K–$125K+) makes it suitable only for large enterprises; Steep learning curve for network administrators unfamiliar with modular platforms; Requires significant power infrastructure (8400W maximum); Configuration complexity increases operational overhead; Price-to-performance ratio may be excessive for mid-market networks