Spatial Streams (MIMO): 4x4 dual-band (2x2 per band)
Aggregate Throughput: 1.7 Gbps
Radios: Dual-band (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz)
Uplink Port Speed: 2.5 Gbps PoE+ port
Max Clients: 250+
PoE Requirement: High PoE+ (60W)
Curation Review
✔ Pros:Enterprise-grade Wi-Fi 6 performance with excellent throughput and coverage; Seamless roaming and band steering within UniFi ecosystem; Compact form factor with premium design suitable for office/hospitality deployments; Strong security features including WPA3 support; Affordable entry-point for enterprise AP deployments; High-density client support with stable connections
✘ Cons:High power consumption (60W PoE+) requires compatible infrastructure and limits deployment flexibility; Firmware updates can introduce instability in production environments; Limited to Wi-Fi 6 (no Wi-Fi 6E upgrade path); 2.4 GHz band performance lags behind 5 GHz due to MIMO configuration; Mandatory UniFi Controller dependency adds complexity for standalone deployments; Overkill for small office/SMB networks with limited concurrent users
Est. Price:
$320 - $450
Compare Against
Cisco Catalyst 9178i
★ 4.3 Value Score
Technical Specifications
Switching Capacity: 204.8 Tbps (full chassis)
Forwarding Rate: 204.8 Tbps
Ports: Up to 288 u00d7 10/25/40/100 Gbps (via modular line cards)
Layer: L2/L3
Stacking Support: Yes (up to 9 units via Stacking Cables)
Chassis Type: 3-slot modular chassis
PoE Budget: Up to 5.6 kW per module (optional PoE+ modules)
Max Power Consumption: 10.2 kW (full chassis)
Backplane Bandwidth: 204.8 Tbps
Throughput per Port: Up to 100 Gbps per port
Cooling: Redundant, variable-speed fans
Uplinks: Multiple 100 Gbps QSFP28 capable
Curation Review
✔ Pros:Industry-leading 204.8 Tbps switching fabric supports next-generation high-density deployments; Modular architecture allows flexible line-card configurations for different port densities and speeds; Full redundancy support (PSU, fan, uplinks) ensures carrier-grade reliability; Native support for Cisco DNA Center and SD-Access intent-based networking; Excellent in-service upgrade capabilities with no traffic disruption
✘ Cons:Significantly higher capital cost compared to fixed-configuration switches; Requires skilled technical staff for modular line-card installation and configuration; Power and cooling infrastructure overhead for large deployments; Complexity of managing modular chassis in smaller networks may be overkill; Limited flexibility in port mix compared to disaggregated options