Spatial Streams (MIMO): 4x4 MIMO (2.4 GHz and 5 GHz)
Aggregate Throughput: 2.4 Gbps
Radios: Dual-band (2.4 GHz, 5 GHz)
Uplink Port Speed: 2.5 Gbps (RJ45)
Max Clients: 256 concurrent
PoE Requirement: 95W PoE+ (802.3at)
Dimensions: 310 x 310 x 33 mm
Antenna Type: Integrated dual-band antenna
Security: WPA3, 802.1X, AES encryption
Curation Review
✔ Pros:Dual 2.5 Gbps uplink for high-bandwidth aggregation; Excellent WiFi 6 coverage and performance in enterprise environments; Cloud-managed via Mist cloud for centralized visibility and analytics; Superior air quality scanning and interference detection; Supports high client density without performance degradation; OFDMA and MU-MIMO for improved throughput in congested networks
✘ Cons:Higher price point compared to WiFi 5 alternatives; Requires PoE+ infrastructure (95W) which older installations may lack; Mist cloud dependency for advanced features increases operational complexity; Limited backward compatibility optimization for older WiFi 4/5 devices; Dense feature set may be overkill for small/medium deployments; Potential learning curve for organizations new to Mist management platform
Est. Price:
$695 - $895
Compare Against
Cisco Catalyst 9178i
★ 4.3 Value Score
Technical Specifications
Switching Capacity: 204.8 Tbps (full chassis)
Forwarding Rate: 204.8 Tbps
Ports: Up to 288 u00d7 10/25/40/100 Gbps (via modular line cards)
Layer: L2/L3
Stacking Support: Yes (up to 9 units via Stacking Cables)
Chassis Type: 3-slot modular chassis
PoE Budget: Up to 5.6 kW per module (optional PoE+ modules)
Max Power Consumption: 10.2 kW (full chassis)
Backplane Bandwidth: 204.8 Tbps
Throughput per Port: Up to 100 Gbps per port
Cooling: Redundant, variable-speed fans
Uplinks: Multiple 100 Gbps QSFP28 capable
Curation Review
✔ Pros:Industry-leading 204.8 Tbps switching fabric supports next-generation high-density deployments; Modular architecture allows flexible line-card configurations for different port densities and speeds; Full redundancy support (PSU, fan, uplinks) ensures carrier-grade reliability; Native support for Cisco DNA Center and SD-Access intent-based networking; Excellent in-service upgrade capabilities with no traffic disruption
✘ Cons:Significantly higher capital cost compared to fixed-configuration switches; Requires skilled technical staff for modular line-card installation and configuration; Power and cooling infrastructure overhead for large deployments; Complexity of managing modular chassis in smaller networks may be overkill; Limited flexibility in port mix compared to disaggregated options