Stacking Support: Yes, up to 10 units (50Gbps stacking bandwidth)
Max Power Consumption: 1380W (typical 1000W)
Dimensions: 442 u00d7 356 u00d7 44 mm
Operating Temperature: 0u201340u00b0C
Curation Review
✔ Pros:Excellent PoE capacity (960W) for dense PoE device deployments; 2.5GbE ports future-proof but not oversized; 10GbE SFP+ uplinks enable scalable data center or campus core connectivity; Layer 3 routing for micro-segmentation; stackable for redundancy and higher throughput aggregation; UNMS/UniFi management integration with cloud or on-prem controllers; fanless passive cooling option available
✘ Cons:Expensive entry point ($1200+) compared to L2-only switches; 2.5GbE ports may be overkill for many deployments (would justify 1GbE + 10GbE); high PoE power budget drives electricity costs; limited L3 feature set vs. carrier-grade routers; firmware bugs/delays historically slower than competition; requires UniFi ecosystem buy-in for optimal management; redundant power supply not standard
Est. Price:
$1,200 - $1,500
Compare Against
Juniper Networks QFX5230-64CD
★ 3.3 Value Score
Technical Specifications
Switching Capacity: 25.6 Tbps
Forwarding Rate: 600 Mpps
Ports: 64x QSFP28 (100G) + 2x 10GbE management
PoE Budget: N/A - Data center switch
Layer: L3 (IP routing)
Stacking Support: Yes - up to 10 units
Fabric Architecture: Modular
Power Consumption: ~3200W typical
Form Factor: 1U RackMount
Buffer Memory: 256 MB per port
Curation Review
✔ Pros:Industry-leading 25.6 Tbps switching capacity; Supports 100G QSFP28 interfaces for high-density deployments; Excellent for data center spine/leaf architectures with low latency; Modular design allows chassis stacking for fault tolerance; Full L3 routing with comprehensive BGP/OSPF support; Power-efficient for large-scale deployments
✘ Cons:High initial capital cost limits adoption in smaller deployments; Requires skilled networking engineers for optimal configuration; Complex licensing model for advanced features; Limited PoE capability makes it unsuitable for access-layer deployments; Proprietary Junos OS requires vendor lock-in; Optical transceiver costs can be substantial for 100G deployment